HomeIFRS vs. GAAPIFRS AdoptersNews & EventsResources Contact Us
 

Wiley IFRS 2008

Barry J.Epstein
Eva K. Jermakowicz
 
 

IFRS Policies & Procedures

Barry J.Epstein
Eva K. Jermakowicz
 
Contact Us
Russell Novak & Co., LLP
225 W. Illinois Street,
# 300
Chicago, IL 60654
1-312-464-3520
bepstein@rnco.com

Download our
IFRS Brochure

Accounting for Long-Lived Assets (Tangible Assets)
IFRS versus GAAP

Listed below are some of the major differences in accounting for long-lived or tangible assets between International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and U.S. GAAP. This material is excerpted from Wiley IFRS 2008: Interpretation and Application of International Financial Reporting Standards.

U.S. GAAP Long-Lived Assets

IFRS Long-Lived Assets

Cost components similar to IFRS except that hedging gain/loss from qualifying cash flow hedges are not includable

 

Cost components similar to US GAAP, but gain/loss from effective cash flow hedging can be added to basis of asset

Change in depreciation method now handled prospectively under recently imposed standard

 

Change in method accounted for prospectively

Mandatory capitalization of construction pe-riod interest costs, only interest costs are subject to capitalization (no ancillary costs can be included)

 

Former optional expensing or capitalization of construction period interest ended by revised IAS 23; capitalization now mandatory; ancillary costs also can be capitalized

Costs of major overhauls generally expensed

 

Costs of major overhauls added to asset

Cost basis required 

Alternatively can use cost basis or revaluation to fair value (entire class of asset must be accounted for under revaluation method)

 

Impairments recognized in current income

 

If cost method used, impairments are recog-nized in income; if revaluation employed, impairment treated as reversal of revaluation unless it exceeds former write-up, in which case excess impairment taken to current income

Impairment suggested when book value exceeds gross expected future cash flows; second step to measure amount of impairment uses discounted present value of cash flows

 

Impairment suggested when book value ex-ceeds greater of value in use (discounted cash flows) or fair value less cost to sell

Impairments, once recognized, cannot be reversed

 

Recognized impairments reversed under defined conditions
Component-level depreciation expected; asset retirement obligations recognized as part of asset cost; changes in estimated amount of obligation effectively amortized over remain-ing term

IFRS has been brought into closer conformity with US GAAP as to component depreciation, accrual of asset retirement obligations, al-though IFRS guidance on retirement obliga-tions is more general; changes in estimated amount of the obligation recognized over re-maining term if cost model is used (if revaluation model, impact is immediately felt in earnings)

 

Like-kind exchanges of productive assets are now measured at fair value, with gain or loss recognized, similar to IFRS

Like-kind exchanges measured at fair value, with gain or loss recognized

 

Investment property must be carried at depreciated cost

Investment property can be carried at depreciated cost or fair value

 

Segregate asset held for sale, write down to lower of amortized cost or fair value less estimated costs to dispose, cease depreciating assets; comparative balance sheet reclassified to report disposal group separately

 

Similar to US GAAP approach, except comparative balance sheet is not restated

Contact IFRS international accounting expert Dr. Barry Epstein, CPA for more information. Learn more about Dr. Epstein at www.ifrsaccountant.com. He can be reached at mailto:bepstein@rnco.com or 312-464-3520.