HomeIFRS vs. GAAPIFRS AdoptersNews & EventsResources Contact Us
 

Wiley IFRS 2009

Barry J.Epstein
Eva K. Jermakowicz
 
 

IFRS Policies & Procedures

Barry J.Epstein
Eva K. Jermakowicz
 
Contact Us
Russell Novak & Co., LLP
225 W. Illinois Street,
# 300
Chicago, IL 60654
1-312-464-3520
bepstein@rnco.com

Download our
IFRS Brochure

Accounting for Business Combinations and Consolidated Financial Statements
IFRS versus GAAP

Listed below are some of the major differences between International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and U.S. GAAP in accounting for business combinations and consolidated financial statements. This material is excerpted from Wiley IFRS 2008: Interpretation and Application of International Financial Reporting Standards.

U.S. GAAP Treatment of Business Combinations and Consolidated Financial Statements

IFRS  Treatment of Business Combinations and Consolidated Financial Statements

Poolings prohibited by FAS 141; consolidation rules effectively based on majority ownership criterion; closing date generally used for recognizing acquisitions (purchases)

 

Poolings (unitings) eliminated by IFRS 3; consolidation rules based on control criterion; control date used for recognizing acquisitions (purchases)

Special consolidation requirements apply to Variable Interest Entities (VIE), consolidation by primary beneficiary generally required

VIEs not yet addressed by IFRS but Special Purpose Entities consolidated under concept of control

 

Recognize post-acquisition obligations only for exiting activities begun before merger, to be completed in one year 

 

Recognize post-acquisition obligations only for provisions that had been recognized by acquired entity

“Qualifying” SPEs to be consolidated if QSPE exceptions not satisfied

 

No concept of QSPE

Consolidation of majority owned subsidiaries required unless control is not exercised by parent

 

Consolidation required unless control is not exercised by parent, or unless control is temporary (to lapse within twelve months)

Step up to fair value only for majority (controlling) interest’s share; minority interest reported at preacquisition book value (but proposed change to full fair value method, including minority share plus goodwill likely to be adopted)

 

Assets and liabilities recorded at full fair value, including minority interest’s share

Acquiree deferred tax recognized only after date of acquisition (i.e., having full valuation allowance at acquisition date) used to offset goodwill, then offset intangible assets, finally to offset tax expense

Subsequent creation of allowance for tax asset recognized in acquisition transaction effected via  charge to tax expense

 

Acquiree deferred tax recognized only after date of acquisition (i.e., having full valuation allowance at acquisition date) is effected as current period credit to tax expense and also goodwill adjustment as if adjustment occurred at acquisition date
No promulgated rules governing “parent company only” financial statements, but use of equity method would be acceptable In “parent company only” financials, the investment in subsidiaries, equity investees, and joint ventures may be presented at cost or under rules for investments in securities, but equity method cannot be used

Not necessary to conform parent and subsidiary accounting policies

 

Need to conform parent and subsidiary accounting policies

Minority interest in consolidated subsidiary can be presented in liabilities, in equity, or in special category (but proposed change will re-quire inclusion in equity)

 

Minority interest included in equity

Acquired in-process R&D expensed as purchased (but proposed change will permit capitalization), post-acquisition-date expenditures on IP R&D expensed

 

Purchased in-process R&D capitalized, and subsequent expenditures generally are also capitalized and amortized

In bargain purchase situations, negative goodwill used to reduce most noncurrent assets’ carrying value, with any excess reported as extraordinary gain (proposed change to conform to IFRS approach)

 

Negative goodwill reported as gain, with no offsetting against acquired assets

Use pooling-type accounting for mergers of entities under common control

 

Use pooling-type accounting for mergers of entities under common control

Contingent consideration recognized when condition is eventually met (but proposed change would conform to IFRS approach)

 

Fair value of contingent consideration included in purchase price allocation process
Goodwill not amortized, tested for impairment

Similar to US GAAP, but different impairment testing procedures

 

One year permitted to finalize purchase price allocation process, including resolution of preacquisition contingencies

 

Similar to US GAAP

Combinations of entities under common control (“brother sister” mergers) accounted for at book value, like former poolings of interest

 

No specific rules for “brother sister” mergers, so either purchase accounting or book value (pooling) accounting is acceptable per parent entity’s policy choice

Current accounting for step acquisitions treats each purchase separately, no remeasurement of previously recognized goodwill (proposed changes would revalue when control achieved)

 

Similar to US GAAP (would be affected by currently proposed changes to both US GAAP and IFRS)
Accrued expense (reserves) can be recognized if post-acquisition restructuring of acquiree is planned

Restructuring reserves generally not allowed, unless acquiree had recorded contingent liability before transaction

 

Contact IFRS international accounting expert Dr. Barry Epstein, CPA for more information. Learn more about Dr. Epstein at www.ifrsaccountant.com. He can be reached at mailto:bepstein@rnco.com or 312-464-3520.